Thursday, 1 March 2012

Critical Response To The MV - Video Killed The Radio Star 1979


My immediate response to this video was boring. It felt like I was listening to a song with excess visual pictures. Everyone in the music video was dull; the men and the women. There wasn't any hype coming from the video. People in the audience seemed a bit confused too; no clapping or cheering.

The thing I think they were promoting was you don't need a video to listen to good music. They were showing how a video such as this ruined the enjoyment of breezy listen to the radio. Themes that were being showed in this music video was dullness. This video is implying the fact that music is still music even in video format.

Events that might have influenced this band might have been the start of television. When television starting, everyone and everything changed dramatically. Television affected everyones lives and producers decided to make music into videos. After this, everyone would be like, "We have T.V to listen to music, there is no point in listening to the radio anymore." That is when 'The Buggles' stepped in.

I was bored watching this video. Honestly, i tried skipping minutes throughout the video, looking for something exciting to happen. Sadly, there was nothing but this lame transition in the middle of the videos. The music video shows the men doing nothing, with blank expressions and the girls all good and happy. When they sang the chorus, the girls sound like they are blaming the guys (who aren't doing anything - no dance no expression) for killing radio music. I felt as if I wasted time watch the video when I could have just listen to it without visuals.

The visual has made me not want to watch the music video anymore, but since the song is so catchy, I'll still listen to it.

The Future

What will become of it? Will we stay the same people we were? Are our actions and behaviours change?
We don't know, it's true, but people don't realize the fact that the internet seduces people. With all this buzz about new internet pages, more and more people get sucked into this hole. Technology is taking us somewhere else...

I've been sitting on the bus many times and overall people I saw reading books were approx. 100/ per year. Thing was, about four of them were reading off of paper books, or hardcovers. The rest, well were reading of e-reader, tablets and iPads. People have been reading off of these tablets instead of reading of paper. I go to the station and I don't find as much people reading of newspapers anymore , because they can read the news off of the apps on their phones or tablets. I don't mind having this around, but people get distracted with this technology. They start to read and they end up getting off track from what they started from (e.i checking msn news and end up playing some angry birds). With, this they have more freedom, which bugs me. I have a similar problem; I'm texting to someone and I end up playing games on my phone not responding till 3 hours later.

Talking about video games, my little cousins have been influenced greatly from them, from the violence to the addictiveness.My cousin, Emanuel, in Grade 4, tries to act like a a character called 'Link' from Legend of Zelda and he ends up hurting my littler cousins. Not only that, when he get home from school, he goes straight to his Wii, while the others, actually finish their homework before watching T.V. Emanuel compared to my cousin Victoria, an age younger is smarter than he is. He apparently is in ESL, and I think it is because of the video games. His mother told me to read with him and throws tantrums, yelling he wants to play his games instead.

Honestly, what happened to modern childhood? When I was a kid, I never cared about those videogames an'all!



Sunday, 29 January 2012

The People, The Media & The Photoshop

This image was not Photoshopped

Photoshop - to alter (a digital image or other image), using an image editing application, especially Adobe Photoshop.
Taken from Google Images
Media - the means of communications, as radio or television, newspapers and magazines, that reach or influence people widely
Taken from Google Images
 

You can see the major differences between the two pictures.
  The one on the right says, "I'm pretty, so that means you have to look like me to be pretty.
On the other hand, the one on the left says, "This is who I truly am. Don't judge me for I know I'm beautiful in my own way.
  People like Naomi Watts is portrayed like this because the 'media' wants us to think that if that's the way celebrities are suppose to look, that is how we are suppose to look as well. It is true that Photoshop does make everything seem better, but it doesn't. It might change some features on their face or what not, but it shows that they are not happy with what they look. They are embarrassed of how they look in reality, when in reality, everyone looks fine in their own way. We aren't all perfect, and that's when the media steps in.
  They try to change you, making you not act and look like yourself. And we all know that they're pretty much using your face and body to create a better looking face and body. We can try to reduce this nonsense by trying to get people to be their selves and try not to act like someone else. People who don't feel right about how they look and envy models in magazines should try to act positive. They can just act like themselves not worrying about how they may look , or stay and live in someone else's shadow. In my opinion, I wouldn't care less about the way I look, because everyone's beautiful in their own special way.
  If I were to see the front cover of a magazine without the use of an image editing application, I would be astonished and surprised that the media can actually let people be themselves. This might not be a possible route because people are still unsure of what they are and how they look. It would probably take a little more time until everyone, especially the media to get used to how people look and how they should look.

-Louis